[From NF Bulletin #18, July 2018]
If I had to pick the absolute worst thing that political correctness has done to us, I would say that would be the way it has driven a now almost insurmountable wedge between men and women. On several occasions in the recent past, I’ve expressed my concern about the growing level of hatred, contempt, and anger which has arisen between men and women involved in the so-called “alt.right.” Yeah, yeah, I know we’re not alt.right, and I know there is something called alt.lite with all kinds of hair-splitting and discussion of various kinds of people who should not be among us at all, but let’s just take all the usual disclaimers as read, please. This isn’t about the alt.right.
Nowhere else is the genocidal and anti-human nature of left-wing political correctness more apparent than in the division it has erected between the sexes. Nothing else has caused more suffering, anguish, disruption to civilization or loss to the world’s White gene pool than the creation of a society where men and women view one another as adversaries and competitors, instead of partners. The instigation and propagation of this hatred between men and women is the Beast’s greatest success story, possibly in the long run a greater victory for the Darkness than Zionism, Marxism, or both world wars.
Nothing serves the Beast’s ultimate agenda of population replacement and White genocide more efficiently. When men and women hate one another, the number of babies born drops like a stone, and we get closer and closer to that point of no return where our racial extinction becomes inevitable. White men are becoming increasingly embittered and misogynist, and White women increasingly feminist, misandrist, and hypergamic, that is to say only marrying up, seeking mates based only on superior social status, wealth and material goods. Hypergamy leads to serious damage to the gene pool and a plunge in White births.
The level of conflict and hatred between the genders has reached the point where there are well-populated internet tendencies such as MGTOW, (Men Going Their Own Way), the incel movement, and the so-called manosphere. Women display their own animus toward men of their own race by simply withdrawing, and having nothing to do with us, basically going off into a corner and bitching about men to one another. In some cases White women have gone over completely to feminism, perversion and political correctness, although not as many as it sometimes appears, I think. I suspect that if honestly offered the old deal, from an honest and decent man with a real trade or profession who looks and comports himself like a man and not an overgrown child, then most women would jump at it.
Let me make clear that I am not only referring to a small group of internet cultists here, which is essentially what White nationalism is right now. I’m referring to men and women as a whole, the remaining portion of the world’s Caucasian population throughout the Western world which has at least the potential to recover themselves morally and socially, and to return to some form of sanity and productive life. That is—big if—if our wee little Movement can ever get our act together, and we can purge the politically correct toxins from our moral and social systems.
We’ve always had this problem; gender representation in all forms of White right or racial dissident movements has always been badly lopsided. Generally speaking, right wing and racial groups, or I should say audiences, since we’re all internet now and there are no more real world organizations consisting of actual human bodies, anyway, our audiences have a membership which is about 95% male; of which probably about 60% of that audience is over the age of 50, which is I think a little bit better than it used to be, and maybe 80% of our audience is over the age of 30. In other words, like all dissident movements, we attract the very people who are most seriously affected by the crisis on a personal level, and who have been personally sodomized by America. I won’t get into the whole yadda yadda about boomers this and Millennials that, we’re not talking about that here, we’re discussing the entire White population of the world, of both genders.
After we lost the last of our buildings back in the early 90s, we used to hold meetings in rented motel banquet rooms. Some guy would take a photo of the speaker for the newspaper or the newsletter from the rear of the room, and all you saw was the backs of grey heads, with the few women present having blue hair. Not a body under 55 in the whole room. The internet has changed that, at least. I will say that there has been some marked improvement in the age level of the White nationalist and separatist audience over the past few years. We’re getting some women now although not anywhere near what we should be, even some of child-bearing age, which never used to happen. Young White men and women are being damaged more and more by political correctness, especially when it comes to college admission and to being able to get a meaningful degree that will actually let a young person earn a living, in an environment which is no longer physically or politically safe for young people of our skin color. I know a lot of young White men are coming to us now because of the way they have been personally victimized, unfortunately by White women in many cases.
Let me make clear just what I’m driving at here. In the past I’ve said that there are some problems which our movement should not even attempt to solve, until such time as we have full state power in a land of our own, but the problem of misogyny and hatred between the genders is not one of them. I believe this issue is so crucial to our racial survival that even in our present discombobulated state, we need to begin making an effort to resolve this situation now.
We have to start re-building bridges between ourselves and our sisters. I’ve said that I wish it was possible to sit down across a negotiating table from some kind of women’s delegation with the authority to speak for and commit Western women to some kind of treaty or social compact, that would involve our sisters deserting the enemy camp and returning to our side where they belong, on the quid pro quo that we men would in turn grow our asses up, cultivate a work ethic, and stop acting like perpetual adolescents in an American Pie movie. And stop doing a lot of other really nasty things that women have every right to complain about.
Vive La Différence!
In the 1890s France was considering giving women the vote, and some famous French feminist whose name I can’t recall was given the honor, unique for a woman at that time, of addressing the National Assembly in full session. All male of course. They sat there attired in their full formal dress suits with the cravats and the white gloves and the spats, wide shoulder sashes, decorations, top hats and other such 1890s politicians’ fripperies. All very French. The lady was up on the podium haranguing them with her feminist rap, which was listened to in polite silence. She concluded her speech with “Really, monsieurs, you must acknowledge that when one comes right down to it, there is very little difference between men and women.” At this remark, the entire French Chamber of Deputies spontaneously rose to its feet as one man, and shouted out “Vive la différence!”
Men and women are different. Not inherently inferior or superior to one another, just different. To say that one sex is in any way inferior or superior to another is like saying that apples are inferior to oranges or vice versa. They are two different fruits; the idea of them being equal or unequal to one another isn’t a real thing.
The differences between men and women are about 20% environmental and psychological, that 20% being subject to a certain limited degree of possible manipulation and alteration, but by no means as much so as feminists would like to have us believe. That’s the part we both need to work on. Beyond that, gender differences are 80% genetic, biological, structural, and biochemical. It’s therefore pointless and absurd to try and create in men and women two “equal” humanoid organisms. It can’t be done, and it is clearly the intention of Nature that it not be done.
Men, on the whole, are physically larger and stronger than women. There are evolutionary reasons for that having to do with the biological functions for which both genders were designed by Nature, or God if you will. Yes, there are individual exceptions, more so in today’s politically correct culture as White males degenerate into Dilbert-esque cubicle rats and Mom’s basement dwellers, and women become more masculine in character, which seems to somewhat augment their physical size. But in more or less organic, non-politically correct societies of all races, men are always larger and stronger.
As an aside, one of the most sinister developments in recent years have been several statistical surveys and studies indicating that sedentary American White males are actually losing their virility in the physical as well as the moral sense; White sperm counts have been dropping for almost twenty years. We are becoming less than men in every sense.
Nature through millions of years of evolution has given human men and women a natural division of labor, one which cannot be repealed by feminism or affirmative action. This natural division of labor can’t be changed by mentally disturbed women running around naked and screaming in public, which is apparently the latest feminist thing. It can’t be changed by anything, it’s hard-wired into all of us by whoever or whatever brought us to be.
That natural division is simple: the man with his strength and propensity for violence provides the food, the shelter, and the protection from enemies for the family unit. The woman bears and raises the children. This is how human beings are supposed to live; indeed, the only way they can live past a couple of confused and chaotic generations of the kind we are experiencing now. It is innate. It is biological. It cannot be changed, and any attempt to tamper with it produces disaster and destruction, as we are now learning in Obama’s America, the house that Barry and Hillary built, and which we are learning cannot be dismantled quickly even by a duly elected President of the United States.
No baby creatures are more helpless than human infants. Snakes and alligators are self-sufficient from the time they hatch, birds and kittens and puppies are up and functioning and providing their own food in a matter of weeks. Human babies must be fed initially by a mother’s milk for a period of months, and then on specially treated and prepared food for another year or so. They cannot defend themselves or escape from an enemy unaided. Children cannot really live on their own with any hope of survival for the first ten or eleven years of life.
The whole “traditional nuclear family” so hated and railed at by liberals and feminists is an institution ordained by God/gods/Nature/The Force/the Great Pumpkin or whatever to make sure that the human species continues to exist. The primary purpose of the man-woman relationship is to produce children and care for them until they are adult enough to fend for themselves. The emotional and cultural side benefits to marriage are valuable and have produced our whole civilization, but they are in fact incidental by-products of the central process of continuing the human species. The father and the mother are not the most vital part of the picture, although they are essential: the children are.
Primitive non-White societies in Africa and the Third World still follow this pattern, in many cases increasing their fecundity through polygamy. In Western cultures, for the most part, men and women have generally mated for life down through the years; there are some records of polygamy in ancient Aryan cultures but not as many as elsewhere. The ancient Norse and Germans practiced it, but gave it up about the turn of the last millennium. For good or for ill, once the White race became Christianized, polygamy vanished, except for odd minor exceptions like the Mormons for about 50 years.
Men and women are two halves of a whole. Neither can or should exist without the other. The idea of two halves of the same organism competing with one another, dominating one another, or existing in enmity with one another is an obvious recipe for destruction. This is why the Beast promotes the idea that men and women are some kind of natural enemies, as it promotes any and all things which are destructive and poisonous and breed confusion and unhappiness among our people. The Beast hates us, and want us all dead, and it uses every weapon to bring this about, including feminism.
Homosexuality is a loathsome perversion. It is absolutely and utterly wrong, because it denies the natural division of labor between man and woman and because it precludes the production of children. The instinctive loathing that the overwhelming majority of normal people feel even today for faggots and dykes is an inner recognition on the part of our genetic makeup (or souls, if you are Christian) that what is going on is unnatural and counter-survival (or sinful).
This is why politically correct brainwashing and social engineering, relatively successful in obtaining a grudging acceptance of mud people as equals, seems largely to have floundered when trying mentally and emotionally to coerce people into accepting the open practice of sodomy. This is especially true when it involves a sodomitic threat to children: Whites are still capable of anger and action when the local school board tries to bring in Heather Has Two Mommies, about the only thing left they will react to. Millions of years of genetic codes triggering biological survival behavior cannot be overwritten by fifty years of Hollywood propaganda or suppressed by hate speech laws.
In order for us to recover the peace, the happiness, the stability and the strength we once had, White people must seek to re-create a world based on natural order, and that most specifically includes a return to what are referred to as traditional family values, with the gainfully employed father as the head of the family and the full-time mother and homemaker as the family’s heart. This does not in any way involve enslaving women; in the very real sense it liberates them from feminism and Judaic values and the true slavery of the marketplace. The women of the future will have a freedom which they have all but lost today—the freedom to be real women.
What feminists want, claim, or advocate is not relevant to anything in the real world. They more than liberals as a whole are doomed to eventual defeat and disappointment, however much they may have achieved a very temporary and very slight, superficial success in the English speaking world. Feminism is essentially a form of sexual perversion, because it distorts what is natural in the sexual roles of men and women. Feminism, like integration and all forms of liberalism, can only be imposed on both men and women at the point of a gun, literally or economically.
Remove the force of the Beast’s law and the economic necessity for women to work simply to make ends meet, and feminism will die, and die quickly. Within a generation it will be nothing more than a bad memory.
